Rig vs terminal tabs
Six tabs and a Procfile is a workflow, not a tool. Rig gives the same processes structure, state and memory.
Who this is for
Anyone living in iTerm
The short answer
Keep Terminal for one-off commands. Use Rig when the day is the same stack of processes and you want state, logs, ports, and MCP without rebuilding the ritual every morning.
Side by side
| Feature | Rig | Terminal tabs | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary job | Named projects + process control | Shell sessions you manage by hand | |
| Start the whole stack | Yes | Partial | Procfile / scripts work — recall and status don’t |
| Unified live logs | Yes | Partial | You can split panes; Rig merges and filters |
| Port reclaim + Attention | Yes | No | |
| MCP for Cursor / Claude | Yes | No | |
| Session memory across reboots | Yes | No | |
| Zero new UI | No | Yes | If you never want another window, stay in the shell |
Choose Rig if
- You restart the same five processes every morning
- You lose track of which tab owns which port
- You want agents on live project state without pasting logs
Stay with the terminal if
- Your work is truly one-off CLI jobs
- You’re happy scripting everything yourself
- You refuse another desktop app on principle
Fair. Rig is for the repeating control-plane loop — not every shell session.
Related guides
Related
- Add a project and start it
- Project groups
- MCP in Rig
- Running local dev processes: from terminal tabs to a process manager
- Procfile validator
- Procfile guide: syntax, process types, and running it locally
- Run multiple dev servers locally: which approach fits
- Rig vs Laravel Herd
- Rig vs Local (WP)
- Rig vs Docker Desktop
- Rig vs Laravel Valet
- Rig Mesh vs a typical private network